AJAY RASTOGI, DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI
Meena Agarwal @ Pallavi Goyal W/o Pradeep Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Pradeep Kumar Goyal S/o Suresh Chandra Goyal – Respondent
Dinesh Chandra Somani, J.
The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant-wife under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act against the judgment and decree dated 19.9.2006 passed by Judge, Family Court, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as 'the Family Court') in Matrimonial Case No.117/2006, whereby the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for seeking divorce, was allowed.
2. Skeletal material facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are that the respondent-husband has filed petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty with the averment that marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized according to Hindu rites and customs on 3.12.1997 at Jaipur. Thereafter, the appellant-wife was living with the respondent-husband and his parents at B-39, Triveni Nagar, Jaipur. After marriage, the respondent-husband came to know that the appellant-wife is suffering from mental derangement and thus, the appellant used to cry and misbehave with her in-laws on very small things. The appellant is under influence of her parents. She
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.