SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2020

VIJAY BISHNOI
Jagmeru Marbles Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sudhir Sharma
For the Respondent: Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit

JUDGMENT :

Vijay Bishnoi, J.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not want to press the challenge to the Rule 73 of the Rajasthan Stamp Rules, 1955 as amended vide notification published on 01.03.1997.

2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the challenge to Rule 73 of the Rajasthan Stamp Rules, 1955 as amended vide notification dated 01.03.1997 is dismissed as not pressed.

3. This writ petition is essentially preferred by the petitioner challenging the validity of the judgment dated 17.09.1999 passed by the Collector (Stamps), Circle Udaipur Camp Banswara in Case No. 34/99 raising a demand on account of deficiency in stamp duty and imposing penalty on the petitioner in relation to the instrument executed between the Rajasthan Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Limited, (for short 'the RIICO' hereinafter), Jaipur and the petitioner on 22.02.1999.

4. Brief facts of the case are that plot Nos. 43 and 44 situated in RIICO Industrial Area Banswara were given on lease to J.C. Cotton Mills Ltd. for 99 years and rent was fixed as Rs. 46.05 per year and Rs. 310/- were deposited as development charges. A leas
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top