SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2050

P.K.LOHRA
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Pappu Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. L.D. Khatri

ORDER :

P.K. Lohra, J.

Appellant-Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. has preferred this appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'Act'), to assail impugned judgment and award dated 06.12.2000 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (First), Jodhpur (for short, 'learned Tribunal') in Claim Case No.55/95(886/95).

2. The grievance of the appellant is limited to the extent learned Tribunal has directed it to pay the amount of compensation and then recover the same from the insured.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that once Tribunal has recorded its finding that insured has violated the terms of the insurance and exonerated insurer from the liability, learned Tribunal ought not to have directed the appellant to pay amount of compensation and then recover the same from insured. In support of his argument, learned counsel has placed reliance on a very vital fact that in view of conflicting decisions of Supreme Court, the matter has been referred to larger Bench and reference is still pending.

4. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced at Bar and perused the impugned judgment and award as well as entire record of the c






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top