SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2061

DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Gayatri Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kulvendar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Dhanesh Saraswat
For the Respondent: Mr. L.D. Khatri

JUDGMENT :

Deepak Maheshwari, J.

This appeal has bee preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'Act of 1988') seeking enhancement of compensation amount awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara (for short, 'learned Tribunal') by its award dated 19th March, 2001. By the said award, the learned Tribunal, on adjudication of the claim of appellants, has assessed compensation in the tune of Rs. 2,13,500/- under different heads in favour of the appellants.

2. Feeling aggrieved, the claimants/appellants have preferred this appeal for enhancement of the award, mainly on four grounds. Firstly, the income of the deceased Ghanshyam has not been properly considered and calculated. Secondly, looking to the number of dependents upon deceased, deduction for his personal living expenses has not been properly made. Thirdly, the multiplier has not been properly pressed into service by the learned Tribunal. Fourthly, the quantum of award for loss of consortium and love and affection has not been properly determined by the learned Tribunal.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has vehemently argued on these grounds during his submissions made
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top