DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI
MANNA LAL – Appellant
Versus
BHURALAL – Respondent
Dinesh Chandra Somani, J.
The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff-petitioner assailing the order dated 13.7.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Behror, District Alwar in Civil Suit No. 34/157/2003 titled as Manna Lal v. Bhura Lal & Ors., whereby the learned trial Court has dismissed the application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 7, Rule 14 (3) and Order 18, Rule 17 read with section 151 CPC.
2. Skeletal material facts necessary for disposal of this petition are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a civil suit against the defendant-respondents for permanent injunction stating therein that the plot in dispute belongs to his ancestors and he is peacefully using the same for his personal use, but now the defendant/respondents are trying to interfere in the peaceful possession and prayed to restrain the defendant/respondents by issuing permanent injunction. The defendant/respondents filed written statement denying averments made in the plaint and stated that the disputed property belongs to one Prahlad Balmiki, who sold the plot to Satyapal and Satyapal sold the same to Sunil Dhanka and handed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.