SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Sabina, J.
Ayub @ Ayub Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 348 of 2016
Decided On : 11-07-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pankaj Gupta.
For the Respondent: Mr. Jeetendra Shrimali.

A person can be termed as "habitual offender" if he has been sentenced for conviction for not less than three occasions.

Headnote:

HISTORY SHEET - OPENING - CONDITIONS - RAJASTHAN POLICE RULES, 1965 - RULE 4.4 - A person can be termed as "habitual offender" if he has been sentenced for conviction for not less than three occasions. In the present case, petitioner was admonished in a case under Section 160 IPC and has been released on probation in a case under Section 341, 323, 34 IPC. Thus, petitioner does not fall within the definition of term "habitual offender."

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the opening of the history-sheet against him by the police. Five FIRs were registered against the petitioner, in two FIRs negative final report was presented, and in three other cases, the petitioner was acquitted.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the petitioner's name was liable to be deleted from the Surveillance Register No. 8 as he did not fall within the definition of "habitual offender" under the Rajasthan Habitual Offenders Act, 1953 and the Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965.

Issues: Whether the petitioner was a "habitual offender" as defined under the Rajasthan Habitual Offenders Act, 1953 and the Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner did not fall within the definition of "habitual offender" as he had not been sentenced for conviction for not less than three occasions. The court also held that the addition of the petitioner's name as a history-sheeter was in violation of his right to lead his life with dignity and reputation.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the police to delete the petitioner's name from Surveillance Register No. 8 and from the website immediately.

ORDER :

Sabina, J.

1. Petitioner has filed this petition under section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the opening of the history-sheet against him by police of Police Station Shastri Nagar, District Jaipur North.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that to open a history-sheet against an individual, the first essential ingredient was that the person should have been convicted twice or more with regard to the offences mentioned in Rule 8.22 of the Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’). Five FIRs were registered against the petitioner. In two FIRs, negative final report was presented by the Investigating Agency, whereas in three other cases, petitioner has been acquitted. Hence the name of the petitioner was liable to be deleted from the Surveillance Register No. 8.

3. Learned State Counsel, on the other hand, has opposed the petition and has submitted that the petitioner is believed to be a habitual offender as five criminal cases were registered against the petitioner.

4. Rule 4.4 of the Rules reads as under:-

"4.4. Surveillance Register No. 8 - (1) In every police station, other than those of the railway police, a Surveillance Register shall be maintained in form 4.4(1).

(2) In part I of such register shall be entered the names of persons commonly resident within or commonly frequenting the local jurisdiction of the police station concerned, who belong to one or more of the following classes:

(a) All persons who have been proclaimed under Section 87, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(b) All released convicts in regard to whom. an order under section 565, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been made.

(c) All convicts the execution of whose sentence is suspended in the whole, or any part of whose punishment has been remitted conditionally under section 401, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

(d) All persons restricted under Rules of Government made under section 8 of the Rajasthan Habitual Offenders Act, 1953.

(3) In part II of such register may be entered at the discretion of the Superintendent:-

(a) Persons who have been convicted twice, or more than twice, of offences mentioned in rule 8.22.

(b) persons who are reasonably believed to be habitual offenders or receivers of stolen property whether they have been convicted or not.

(c) persons under security under sections 109 or 110, code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(d) convicts released before the expiration of their sentences under the Prisons Act and Remission Rules without the imposition of any conditions."

5. A perusal of the said Rule reveals that in the first part of the Register names of the persons would be entered in the Surveillance Register who are commonly resident within or commonly frequenting the local jurisdiction of the concerned police station and who are either proclaimed offenders under Section 87 Cr.P.C. 1973 or released convicts in regard to whom order has been passed under Section 465 Cr.P.C. 1973 or the convicts whose sentence has been suspended in the whole or in part under Section 401 Cr.P.C. 1973.

6. In part II of the Register, names of the persons may be entered at the discretion of the Superintendent, who have been convicted twice or more than twice of offences mentioned in Rule 8.22 of the Rules or the persons who are believed to be habitual offenders or receivers of stolen property whether they have been convicted or not or persons under security under section 109 or 110 Cr.P.C. 1973 or convicts released before expiration of their sentence by allowing them remissions.

7. Section 2(a) of the Rajasthan Habitual Offenders Act, 1953 reads as under:-

"2(a) "habitual offender" means a person who, during any continuous period of five years, whether before or after the 15th day of September, 1952 or partly before and partly after the said day, has been sentenced on conviction on not less than three oc







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top