SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2154

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
VIJAY BISHNOI, J.
Sundar - Appellant
Vs.
Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8030 of 2017
Decided On : 01-08-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Hemant Jain, Mr. R.S. Choudhary

Headnote:

Tender Laws – Review of Qualifications for Tender – Both these writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners-firms being aggrieved with the qualification requirements mentioned in the tender document (NIT) issued by the respondent - Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited inviting tenders from the eligible bidders for giving contract for operation and maintenance of 33/11 KV Sub-Stations identified, in respect of various sub-divisions of respective circles under Jodhpur Discom i.e. SE(O&M) JdVVNL, Sri Ganganagar – Held, The scope of judicial review in award of contracts has been defined by the Honble Supreme court in various decisions. The ultimate conclusion of the decisions of the Honble Supreme Court is this that the High Court can interfere in the contractual matters when the action of the tendering authority is found to be malicious, discriminatory or the process adopted or decision made is so arbitrary and irrational that the court can say, the decision is such that no responsible authority acting reasonably and in accordance with relevant law could have reached. It has also been held that where the public interest is affected, the court can also interfere in the contractual matters – Undisputedly, the petitioners are not meeting the qualification requirements as mentioned in the tender document but this fact does not give right to them to challenge the said qualification requirements until and unless they prove that the respondents have fixed those requirements malafidely or in violation of statutory provisions – If the petitioners are not meeting the said requirements, they cannot claim as a matter of right that despite lacking the qualifications, they are entitled to participate in the tender process – In the present cases, the petitioners have failed to make out a case of mala fide or violation of statutory powers – Hence, in view of the limited scope of judicial review in the contract matters, no relief can be granted to the petitioners – The judgments, on which the learned counsels for the petitioners have placed reliance are of no help to them in view of the above referred judgments of the Honble Supreme Court –Consequently, both the writ petitions fail and are hereby dismissed – Petitions Dismissed

ORDER :

Vijay Bishnoi, J.

Both these writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners-firms being aggrieved with the qualification requirements mentioned in the tender document (NIT) issued by the respondent - Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (for short 'the JdVVNL' hereinafter) inviting tenders from the eligible bidders for giving contract for operation and maintenance of 33/11 KV Sub-Stations identified, in respect of various sub-divisions of respective circles under Jodhpur Discom i.e. SE(O&M) JdVVNL, Sri Ganganagar. The qualification requirements as mentioned in the tender document read as under:

"a. The Bidder should possess class "A/B" Electrical license issued by Electrical Inspectorate of any state Govt. or Central Govt. of India and is a qualified contractor who regularly undertakes the projects of the type specified and has adequate technical knowledge and practical experience. If the bidder owns a license other than Rajasthan state, then he will have to obtain it within one month from electrical inspectorate of Govt. of Rajasthan before commencement of the work in case he is selected for award failing which the contract awarded is likely to be cancelled. An undertaking to this effect is to be furnished along with bid. The registration should be valid from the date of start of the work and shall remain valid up to 30 days from the date of completion of contract period.

i. the bidder should have at-least Three Years experience for operation and maintenance of 33/11 KV sub station and bidder having similar exposures in higher voltage class than 33 KV i.e. 66 KV, 132 KV & 220 KV etc. shall also be considered for Technical Evolution, during last five financial years from date of opening of Bid i.e. from 2012-13 to 2016-17 in any of the Discoms.

ii. The Bidder should have minimum experience of three years for operation & Maintenance of GSS of 50% quantity of GSS for which bidder quoted in last five years.

iii. The copies of the relevant detailed work orders should be enclosed regarding above work experience.

iv. The 'G' Schedule/reports indicating various activities of works executed should also be enclosed along with satisfactorily work completion certificate issued by concerned officer not below the rank of Executive Engineer or equivalent in case of in any of the Discoms.

b. The Bidder should have Minimum Annual Turnover (MAT) not less than 50% value of estimated cost of Tender/lot, for which bidder quoted, in any one year of last five financial years. In case a bidder is quoting for more than one Lot, Pre-qualification requirement shall be examined on the basis of sum of Lot requirements of MAT of all quoted Lot. Details of all lot are available at "Annexure-F". A CA Certified certificate is required for the same.

c. The contractor should be registered with PF and ESI Department in case of notified area. The certificate may be produced prior to opening bid.

d. The contractor should possess the valid license as provided under section 12 of the contract labour (R&A) Act 1970, an attested photocopy of which should be submitted by the Contractor.

The work of Operation & Maintenance of GSS under the domain of Jodhpur Discom shall be one year initially. Nigam shall review same as per need and same can be extended for one more additional year."

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the requirements mentioned in sub-clauses i and ii of clause 'a' and clause 'b' in particular. The main grounds of challenging the said conditions taken by the petitioners in these petitions are thus:

(a) That no such conditions were ever incorporated by the respondents in the previous tenders.

(b) That the Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited had floated identical tender for similar nature of work and in the tender process conducted by it, majority of the contractors had failed to meet the qualification requirements, which were similar to the qualification requirements, which are under challenge in these writ petitions and from this fact, it is clear that the s













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top