SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2195

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Manoj Kumar Vyas – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mukesh Mehra
For the Respondent: Mr. M.S. Panwar

ORDER :

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.

This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the order dated 24.12.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Revision Petition No.10/2016 and NCV No.209/2016, rejecting the revision petition as well as the application filed by the petitioner, pending trial in Special Court, Negotiable Instruments Act Cases No.3, Jodhpur Metropolitan under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is seeking age of the cheque and ink on the cheque through the report of the Foresic Science Laboratory, so as to make out a case that if the cheque is more than three months old, then the provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act shall not apply.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the precedent law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in S.Rama Krishna v. S. Rami Reddy & Ors., reported in 2008(3) CJ (SC) Cr. 867 as well as by this Court in Bhagwati Lal v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., reported in 2013(2) NIJ (Raj.) [NOC].

4. As per the precedent law, the cheque, which was five years o






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top