AJAY RASTOGI, ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Meeta Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Shashikant Bhardwaj – Respondent
Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2007 whereby the Family Court No. 2, Jaipur has allowed the application of respondent-husband granting him decree of divorce under Section 13(1) (i-a) and 13(1) (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and has further granted permanent alimony of Rs. 2000/- per month under section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that respondent applicant-Shashikant Bhardwaj was married with the appellant non-applicant-Smt. Meeta Sharma as per Hindu rites on 15.02.1996. The appellant and respondent were residing at Joshi Colony, Barkat Nagar, Jaipur though the respondent was serving as Government Teacher and was posted at Raniwal Maji, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur. The appellant started residing at Raniwal from the year 1999 in a rented premise and out of wedlock, a child (son) was born on 25.04.2000. The respondent-husband filed an application on 22.05.2003 in the Family Court No. 2, Jaipur under Section 13(1)(i-a) and 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1955) for seeking a decree of divor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.