SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2209

DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI
LAXMINARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
RAMSWROOP – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sunil Jain, Advocate

ORDER :

Dinesh Chandra Somani, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. The instant petition has been filed by the plaintiff petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 11.8.2016 passed by District Judge, Tonk (hereinafter referred to as the 'learned trial Court') in Civil Suit titled as Laxmi Narain & Anr. v. Ram Swaroop & Ors., whereby the learned trial Court has directed the plaintiff-petitioners to pay ad-valorem court fee on sale consideration recited in the sale deed dated 26.4.2014.

3. The material facts necessary for disposal of this petition are that the plaintiff-petitioners filed a civil suit in the Court of District Judge, Tonk to declare the sale deed dated 26.4.2014 executed by the defendant-respondents No.1 to 3 in favour of defendant-respondent No.4, to be null and void and for permanent injunction. After hearing learned counsel for the plaintiff petitioners, the learned trial Court passed the impugned order dated 11.8.2016. Being aggrieved with the said order, the plaintiff-petitioners have approached this Court by way of this petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the learned trial Court has comple

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top