SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2242

GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
RANGLAL – Appellant
Versus
GOPAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Suresh Shrimali and Mr. Rishabh Shrimali, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. M.P. Goswami and Mr. Deepak Bishnoi, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Goverdhan Bardhar, J.

Instant appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 18.01.2002 passed by learned Judge, MACT, Rajsamand in Claim Case No. 578/1998 whereby, the learned Judge has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs. 4,70,000/- to the claimant appellant.

2. Succinctly stated, facts of the case are that a claim petition was filed by the claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajsamand under Section 140/166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'], stating therein that on 10.05.1995 at 6:30 PM when he was going towards Odan along with his son Mukesh on Scooter No. RPJ 6324, at that time the Jeep No. RJ 27/ T 0008 being rash and negligently driven by the driver of jeep hit the scooter due to which he suffered grievous and simple injuries. The claimant Rang lal by way of claim petition sought compensation in the sum of Rs. 20,20,000/- from the respondents.

3. The non-claimant no.1 driver of the vehicle in his reply stated that the vehicle was not











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top