MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Haluka – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Goverdhan Bardhar, J.
In both the criminal appeals the accused appellants Haluka and Ashok Kumar have challenged the Judgment of conviction and sentence dated 20.10.2014 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.1, Bayana (Bharatpur) in Sessions Cases No. 38/2014 (85/11) whereby the learned trial court has convicted and sentenced both the accused appellants under section 364A IPC to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine the accused appellant was to further undergo simple imprisonment of one year; under section 120B IPC to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine the accused appellant was to further undergo simple imprisonment of one year and under section 386 IPC to ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine the accused appellant was to further undergo simple imprisonment of one year. Sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. Prosecution story in brief is that Hakim Singh (PW8) s/o Shri Nathi Ram r/o Village Harinagar, Tehsil Roopbas, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) submitted a written report (Ex.P5) on 18.02.2011 to SHO, Police Station, Roopbas (Bharatp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.