SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 466

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Haluka – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Anil Jain, Ashok Kumar, Dinesh Kumar Garg, Sanjay Mehla, Soniya Shandaliya

JUDGMENT :

Goverdhan Bardhar, J.

In both the criminal appeals the accused appellants Haluka and Ashok Kumar have challenged the Judgment of conviction and sentence dated 20.10.2014 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.1, Bayana (Bharatpur) in Sessions Cases No. 38/2014 (85/11) whereby the learned trial court has convicted and sentenced both the accused appellants under section 364A IPC to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine the accused appellant was to further undergo simple imprisonment of one year; under section 120B IPC to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine the accused appellant was to further undergo simple imprisonment of one year and under section 386 IPC to ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine the accused appellant was to further undergo simple imprisonment of one year. Sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Prosecution story in brief is that Hakim Singh (PW8) s/o Shri Nathi Ram r/o Village Harinagar, Tehsil Roopbas, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) submitted a written report (Ex.P5) on 18.02.2011 to SHO, Police Station, Roopbas (Bharatp


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top