Back
2018 Supreme(Raj) 533
IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Virendra Kumar Mathur, J.
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION - Appellant
Vs.
SAMTA DEVI AND OTHERS - Respondent
C.M.A (Civil) No. 1038 of 2001
Decided On : 23-03-2018
The importance of accurately including the date of pronouncement in uploaded judgments.
Headnote:
Judgment Date - Omission of Date of Pronouncement - The court ordered the removal of a judgment uploaded without the date of pronouncement and directed the upload of the judgment with the correct date.
Fact of the Case:
The judgment was uploaded without the date of pronouncement, which was later found to be an omission.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the omission of the date of pronouncement was bona fide and ordered the removal of the judgment without the date and the upload of the judgment with the correct date.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the omission of the date of pronouncement was deemed to be bona fide.
Final Decision: The court ordered the removal of the judgment uploaded without the date of pronouncement and directed the upload of the judgment with the correct date.
Virendra Kumar Mathur, J.
The file has been placed before me, being listed today in Chamber under "To be mentioned" category. The appeal has been decided and judgment was pronounced on 21.03.2018.
2. It is reported that while uploading the judgment, date of pronouncement skipped to be inserted in the soft-copy. I have perused the file and uploaded judgment (without date) . The uploaded judgment is the very same judgment, which was signed by me and date of pronouncement thereon was entered in my handwriting and the same is available in the file.
3. The omissions of skipping insertion of the 'date of pronouncement' before uploading the aforesaid judgment seems to be bona fide.
4. It is, therefore, ordered that judgment uploaded without inserting date of pronouncement be removed from the website and judgment with 'date of pronouncement' be uploaded.
