SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 553

ARUN BHANSALI
GANESHMAL – Appellant
Versus
MAGHA RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alkesh Aggarwal, Arvind Samdariya, Advocates.

JUDGMENT/ORDER :

Arun Bhansali, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed by the petitioners under Section 151 CPC for bringing on record legal representatives of petitioner No. 1 Ganesh Mal.

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Legal representatives as indicated in the application are taken on record.

3. This revision petition is directed against order dated 07.03.1994 passed by Additional District Judge, Pali, whereby, the appeal filed by the petitioners against order dated 17.01.1994 has been modified.

4. After filing of the revision petition, provisions of Section 115 CPC stands amended and in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chandra Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675 the present revision petition is not maintainable.

5. Besides the above, it may be noticed that the matter has remained pending before the Larger Bench for all these years, there is no interim order passed in the present revision petition and the modified order passed by the Appellate Court has remained in currency for now over 24 years.

6. In view thereof, the revision petition filed by the petitioners is dismissed as not maintainable. It w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top