SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 564

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Arjun – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Aniket Sharma, Rinesh Gupta, Sonia Shandilya.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Mohammad Rafiq, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the accused-appellants challenging judgment and order dated 28.11.1988 passed by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur (for short 'the trial court') whereby they have been convicted and sentenced in the following manner:-

Name of the accused

Section

Sentence

1. Arjun

302/149 IPC

Life imprisonment with fine of Rs. 200/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo two months' rigorous imprisonment.

2. Smt. Mohari

3. Smt. Mangali

1. Arjun

148 IPC

Two years' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 200/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo two months' rigorous imprisonment.

2. Smt. Mohari

3. Smt. Mangali

1. Arjun

447 IPC

One month's simple imprisonment.

2. Smt. Mohari

3. Smt. Mangali

2. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Facts of the case are that the deceased Ram Narain and the accused appellant Arjun are real brothers and there was some dispute regarding the partition o
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top