SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 586

P.K.LOHRA
Salim – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohd Yunus, O.P. Rathi.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

P.K. Lohra, J.

1. Accused-Petitioner has preferred this revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. to assail impugned judgment dated 10th of July, 2017, passed by Additional Sessions Judge No. 5, Jodhpur Metropolitan, Jodhpur (for short ‘learned appellate Court’) qua him, whereby the learned appellate Court has partly allowed his appeal to alter judgment dated 28th of July, 2016, passed by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (C.B.I. Cases), Jodhpur Metropolitan (for short ‘learned trial Court’). The learned trial Court, upon conclusion of the trial, convicted petitioner for offence under Sections 420/120-B, 467, 468 and 471 IPC and two others, viz. Jitendra Bansal and Gafoor, for offence under Section 420/120-B IPC.

2. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner as well as Jitendra Bansal and Gafoor preferred three separate appeals before learned appellate Court. The learned appellate Court allowed appeals of Jitendra Bansal and Gafoor facilitating their acquittal for offence under Section 420/120-B IPC by extending benefit of doubt. The appeal filed by petitioner was also partly allowed by the learned appellate Court resulting in annulment of his conviction under












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top