JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.

The petitioners have preferred this writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following relief’s :

"(i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 25.01.2018 (Annexure-8) may kindly be quashed and set aside;

(ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the application filed by the respondents/ plaintiffs under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1972 may kindly be dismissed in the Civil Original Suit No. 68/2016 (Kuldeep Kour and Anr. Vs. Jai Ram & Anr) pending in the court of Special Judge, NDPS Cases, District Sriganganagar;

(iii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems appropriate and genuine may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioners;

(iv) Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioners;"

2. Precisely the facts of the case are that the respondent No.2 and 3 filed a suit for specific performance for an agreement dated 25.03.2006 regarding the agricultural land measuring 11 bighas and 17 biswas in Murabba No. 54 in Village 2 C Chhoti, Tehsil and District Sriganganagar. The father of the petitioners was said to be the sole owner of the disputed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document