SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 622

ARUN BHANSALI
Raju Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mangelal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Aakash Kakkar, Navneet Poonia, Trilok Joshi, Advocates

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

Arun Bhansali, J.

This revision petition is directed against the order dated 14.08.2015 passed by the Addl. District Judge No.1, Sriganganagar ('the trial court'), whereby the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 ('the Act'), has been decreed and the petitioner has been directed to hand over possession of the disputed property to the respondent-plaintiff within a period of two months and from 01.08.2012 till handing over of actual possession, mesne profit @ Rs.2, 000/- per month along with interest @ 6% per annum has been decreed.

2. The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit, inter alia, with the averments that he had purchased the suit property i.e. House No.1-A-22, Shyamnagar, Purani Abadi, Sriganganagar admeasuring 15 feet X 64 feet from one Kanhaiyalal vide registered sale-deed dated 02.03.2012. It is claimed that the plaintiff was handed over possession of the suit property at the time of registration of the sale-deed. The petitioner by breaking the wall of the suit property, trespassed over the said property in April, 2012. the petitioner came to know about the same on 01.08.2012 and, consequently, filed the suit















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top