SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 635

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, G.R MOOLCHANDANI
Sanjeev Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Shefali Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Mathur, Memoon Khalid, R.K Agrawal, Rahul Patni, Advocates

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

On 05/06/2012 the appellant filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking decree of divorce alleging mental cruelty committed against him by the respondent.

2. He pleaded that the marriage between the couple was solemnized on 06/12/1989 as per Hindu custom at Jaipur. Two children, a son named Yash, aged 20 years and a daughter named Priya, aged 14 years when the petition was filed were born to the couple.

3. He pleaded that he was carrying on the business in Stones in Jaipur and his work required him to visit London. His wife used to accompany him during business tours. He was maintaining a residence at Jaipur and also at London.

4. Setting the scene for the cause of action he pleaded that for the last five years the attitude of his wife had turned hostile. She started quarreling with him, on trivial issues. Since last five years his wife started checking his e-mails as also the mobile phone with a suspicion concerning which females he was meeting. That for the last five years his wife was pressurizing him not to keep any female staff in the office. That he should not do business with a person who has employed female s























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top