1. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition with the following prayer :-

“1. Quash the order dated 07.10.2013.

2. The application of the respondents filed under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC may kindly be ordered to be rejected.

3. Any other appropriate order, which deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner-defendant.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondents had filed the civil suit seeking permanent injunction against the petitioners in respect of a plot situated at Swarupganj. The suit was filed in 2005 whereas the written statement was filed by the defendant on 18.02.2006. The issues were framed on 29.03.2007 and the proceedings carried on thereafter. The respondent plaintiff filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 seeking amendment in the plaint on two counts. The first count was that the parameters describing the surroundings of the property were to be rectified. Secondly, the amendment sought is that the possession has been taken by the petitioner defendant before 28.10.2005.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has clearly pointed out that the suit of 2005 where the issues