SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 685

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR
P.K. LOHRA, J.
Puranmal S/o Shri. Bagdiram Kumhar – Appellant
Vs.
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 976 of 2015
Decided on : 03-04-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.L. Bishnoi
For the Respondent: Mr. O.P. Rathi, Public Prosecutor.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 8/18 - NDPS Act - Section 8/18 – Tenant – Evidence - Upon seeing police party driver of motorcycle made an attempt to take a reverse turn at about away from but his that attempt failed as due to high speed of motorcycle it skidded on its right side – Held, Therefore for doing substantial justice in matter judicial conscience has persuaded me to alter and modify substantive sentences awarded to appellants as well as fine and sentence in default of payment of fine - Moreover, in wake of fact that substantive sentence handed down to co-accused Gavin is affirmed by this Court while deciding his appeal – Order accordingly

JUDGMENT :

P.K. LOHRA, J.

Appellants, convicted for offence of contravention in relation to opium poppy and opium, which is an offence under Section 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, ‘NDPS Act’), and also the first appellant convicted for offence of allowing premises etc. to be used for commission of offence, which constitutes offence under Section 8/25 of the NDPS Act, have preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C). The Special Judge, NDPS Cases, No. 1, Chittorgarh (for short, learned trial Court’) by judgment dated 1st of October, 2015, while holding guilty for aforesaid offences, handed down following sentences to the appellants:

Appellant

Puranmal:

U/s. 8/18 NDPS Act

20 years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1 Lakh, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three years' simple imprisonment.

U/s 8/25 NDPS Act

20 years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1 Lakh, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three years' simple imprisonment.

Appellant

Govind alias Govindram:

U/s. 8/18 NDPS Act

20 years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1 Lakh, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three years' simple imprisonment.

2. The learned trial Court also ordered that all the sentences shall run concurrently.

3. The facts apposite, unfurling prosecution case, are that on 24th of August, 2005, at 8 AM, Circle Officer, Nimbaheda, District Chhitorgarh, Mr. Yogesh Goyal, received an information from Mukhbir about three persons of Kumhar caste, residents of village Chorliya Mewasa, coming on motorbike No.RJ-09-5M-4474 from their village with destination of Arnoda Batho, carrying opium poppy and opium to be delivered to opium traffickers/smugglers near Arnoda Batho. The CO., thereupon reduced the said information in writing and immediately endorsed a copy thereof to his immediate superior under subsection (2) of Section 42 of the NDPS Act. Thereafter, the police team with requisite investigation material proceeded from police station and on the way summoned Motbirs and after obtaining their consent to act as such, reached the spot to arrange ‘Nakabandi’. At the spot, when the police team was vigilantly waiting for arrival of the motorcycle, a motorcycle reached there with three persons seated on it; one driver and two pillion riders. Upon seeing the police party, the driver of the motorcycle made an attempt to take a reverse turn at about 25 mtrs away from Nakabandi but his that attempt failed as due to the high speed of motorcycle it skidded on its right side.

4. Immediately, thereafter, the driver of motorcycle and the second pillion rider fled away from the scene but other pillion rider carrying one bag in his hand was apprehended by the police. On inquiry, he revealed his name Girdhari and further divulged the names of two others as Puranmal and Govind, i.e. both the appellants. The motorcycle was checked thereafter and its registration number matched the information of Mukhbir. Accused Girdhari was apprehended on the spot, served a notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act and apprised his right in connection with his personal search and seizure in presence of Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. Be that as it may, eventually, the search and seizure proceedings were undertaken by the concerned CO. The bag, which accused Girdhari was carrying, was searched and in the bag three small polythene bags showing weight 7 kg, 4 kg and 4 kg respectively were found. All the three polythene bags were opened and when smelt opium was found therein for which no licence was available with Girdhari.

5. Thereafter, on weighing all the three polythene bags collectively, its total weight came to 15 kg. Later on, from each of the bag, sample of 30 gms was co














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top