SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 698

VIJAY BISHNOI
Prithviraj Patwari Kumahar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Bheemkant Vyas.
For the Respondents: J.P. Bhardwaj, P.P. and M.S. Amrawat.

JUDGMENT :

VIJAY BISHNOI, J.

1. As per the directions of this Court, status report has been received from the trial court, wherein, it is mentioned that the trial against the petitioner is going on and three prosecution witnesses have been summoned for giving their evidence on 6.3.2018.

2. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed on behalf of the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 30.6.2016 whereby, the criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the Special Judge, Rent Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Metropolitan (for short 'the revisional court'). In the said criminal revision petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 8.11.2010 passed by the Addl. Judicial Magistrate (Junior Division) No. 3, Jodhpur (for short 'the trial court') whereby, the trial court has ordered for framing charge against him for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that as a matter of fact, the FIR has been filed after a delay of about 16 years. It is also argued that as a matter of fact, the land in question was transferred in the name of wife of the petitioner through a regis











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top