SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 775

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Sunda Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pradeep Shah, Adv., Rajesh Bhati, Adv., Vijay Raj Bishnoi, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J.

The appellants have filed the present Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 29.04.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (FT) Jalore Camp Bhinmal in Sessions Case No. 53/2007 (26/07) whereby the appellants have been convicted for offences under Section 447, 326, 324, 323 read with 34 IPC and sentenced as under :-

Section 447 IPC

One month simple imprisonment

Section 323/34 IPC

Six months R.I.

Section 324/34 IPC

One year rigorous imprisonment

Section 326/34 IPC

Five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo six months R.I.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant Prakash Chandra lodged an FIR on 10.03.2007 at around 5 PM at P.S. Chitalwana stating therein that on that day, in the morning at around 9 am, when his brother Kishan lal was going to school, the accused appellants came armed with axe and spade and started beating Kishan lal. On raising voice, the complainant Prakash Chandra, Babu and Jagdish came on the site and
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top