SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 820

SANDEEP MEHTA
YUVRAJ SINGH SANDU – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
S.P. Sharma, Adv., Kaushal Sharma, Adv., O.P. Mehta, Adv., Sajjan Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J.

Through this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Yuvraj Singh has approached this court for assailing the order Annex.6 dated 06.05.2014 passed by the respondent Indian Oil Corporation Limited (for short, 'IOCL'), whereby the petitioner was disqualified from award of LPG distributorship at the location Rani, District Pali in the open category as published vide the advertisement dated 13.03.2010 and so also the consequent order Annex.11 dated 13.08.2016, whereby the said dealership was awarded to the respondent Nirbhay Singh Solanki.

2. Mr. S.P. Sharma, learned counsel representing the petitioner, vehemently and fervently urged that the petitioner was ranked topmost in the list of entitled empanelled candidates pursuant to the selection exercise undertaken by the respondent IOCL. The land details provided by the petitioner were found compliant with the requirement of the advertisement and the selection guidelines. The educational certificates of the petitioner were duly verified. The respondents acted in a totally highhanded fashion and entertained a frivolous compliant regarding the land offered by the petitioner and






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top