SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 840

SANDEEP MEHTA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Sarla Devi Sethia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S. Rajpurohit, Adv., S.L. Jain, Adv.

JUDGMENT

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. The instant bunch of writ petitions involves common questions of facts and law and is thus being decided together by this single Judgment.

2. The petitioner State of Rajasthan through Sub-Registrar (Registration & Stamps), Churu has approached this Court by way of these writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for assailing identical judgments dated 25.05.2011 passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer in Revisions No.(2020/2007, 2021/2007 and 2022/2007) affirming the orders dated 26.07.2007 passed by the Collector (Stamps), Bikaner in three separate references.

3. Facts in brief are that private respondents herein purchased properties located opposite the Brahmcharya Ashram, Churu in the year 2005. The stamps for registration were presented in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Churu on 09.08.2005 and the same were returned after registration of the sale-deeds. During subsequent assessment made by audit party of the Accountant General, it came to light that the property in question is located in the prime commercial market area and thus, it was considered fit to get references made for determination of the stamp duty chargeable on t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top