SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 909

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Hemendra Kumar Sharma @ Monu – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harendra Singh, Adv., Jaswant Singh Rathore, Adv., Sudesh Saini, Adv.

JUDGMENT

PANKAJ BHANDARI, J.

Admit.

2. With the consent of the parties, the case is taken up for hearing for final disposal.

3. Appellant has preferred this appeal aggrieved by judgment and order dated 13.03.2018 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur in Sessions Case No.45/2014 (59/2014), whereby trial Court has convicted the appellant for offence under Section 306 IPC and has sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and has also imposed fine of Rs. 2,000/-, on non payment of fine to further undergo one month simple imprisonment.

4. In brief, the facts of the case are that on 16.08.2013, deceased committed suicide, an inquest report was lodged on the same day with regard to suicide. After eight days i.e. on 24.08.2013, complaint Ex.P-2 was lodged which was sent to the police for registration of F.I.R. Consequently, F.I.R. Ex.P-14, was registered. After due investigation police submitted charge-sheet under Section 306 IPC against the appellant. Court after hearing the charge-arguments, charged the appellant for offence under Section 306 IPC. Appellant denied the charges and sought trial.

5. As many as fifteen witnesses were examined on behalf of the pros


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top