SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 966

ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Dilip Buildcon Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
R.P. Singh, Nishant Sharma, J.M. Saxena, S.S. Hora, Rahul Lodha

JUDGMENT :

Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.

The petitioner-Company has filed the present petition challenging the order dated 05.01.2018 wherein its technical bid has been treated as "non-responsive" on account of not fulfilling the required experience of seven years, as the petitioner-Company is alleged to have commenced the construction work on 27.12.2010.

2. The petitioner-Company has felt aggrieved against order dated 29.01.2018, passed by the Chief Engineer (first appellate authority) and order dated 13.04.2018, passed by the Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department (second appellate authority), who have rejected the first and second appeals respectively filed by the petitioner-Company against rejection of his technical bid, communicated to him vide order dated 05.01.2018.

3. The petitioner-Company has further sought a mandamus against the respondents to consider its technical bid as responsive and to evaluate the financial bid accordingly in pursuance of E Notice Inviting Bid No.07/2017-18 dated 10.10.2017 for construction of Isarda Dam, across Banas river for drinking water, near
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top