ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Dilip Buildcon Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.
The petitioner-Company has filed the present petition challenging the order dated 05.01.2018 wherein its technical bid has been treated as "non-responsive" on account of not fulfilling the required experience of seven years, as the petitioner-Company is alleged to have commenced the construction work on 27.12.2010.
2. The petitioner-Company has felt aggrieved against order dated 29.01.2018, passed by the Chief Engineer (first appellate authority) and order dated 13.04.2018, passed by the Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department (second appellate authority), who have rejected the first and second appeals respectively filed by the petitioner-Company against rejection of his technical bid, communicated to him vide order dated 05.01.2018.
3. The petitioner-Company has further sought a mandamus against the respondents to consider its technical bid as responsive and to evaluate the financial bid accordingly in pursuance of E Notice Inviting Bid No.07/2017-18 dated 10.10.2017 for construction of Isarda Dam, across Banas river for drinking water, near
Central Coalfields Limited and Another Vs. SLL-SML (Joint Venture Consortium) and Others
Ganpati Rv-Talleres Alegria Track Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UOI and Another
Industrial Promotion & Investment Corp. of Orissa Ltd. Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
K.K. Dixit and Others Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board and Another
New Horizons Ltd. & Anr. Vs. UOI & Ors.
W.B. State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.