SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 1105

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Jeevan Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kailash Jangid, J.P. Joshi, Tarun Joshi, Kusum Rao.

JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:

"(a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, any order denying the final selection and appointment of the petitioner for his respective cadre post and category in pursuance of the advertisement dated 24.06.2013 (Annex-1) may kindly be quashed and set aside.

(b) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to pass the order to constitute the Expert Committee to provide the report of actual answers while considering the questions/objections submitted by the petitioner as per the authentic books in pursuance of the advertisement dated 24.06.2013 for the post of RAS/RTS.

(c) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to re-determine the complete merit/result of the petitioner for final selection and appointment process while making the necessary corrections in the answer sheets of his Main Examination for the questions quoted aforesaid for the post of RAS/RTS in pursuance of t



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top