1. By way of this appeal, the appellant has assailed the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge whereby learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner-appellant herein confirming the order of the First Appellate Authority and Second Appellate Authority.

2. The facts of the case are that respondent No.2 (a Government Company) issued Notice Inviting Bids (NIB) for supply of surgical equipment and sutures including "Regular Sutures", "Synthetic Absorbable Sutures" and "Synthetic Absorbable Antibacterial Triclosan Coated Sutures". Items at Serial No.R-9, R-11, R-12, R-13, R-15, R-17, R-18 R-19, R-64, R-65 & R67 related to "Synthetic Absorbable Sutures". Items at serial No. R-68 to R-74 related to "Synthetic Absorbable Antibacterial Triclosan Coated Sutures". E-bids were required to be submitted in two parts namely Technical Bid and Price Bid. The controversy in the present case relates to antibacterial coated sutures. The bidders were required to be either manufacturer having valid manufacturing licence or direct importer holding valid