Nirmaljit Kaur, J.

Both the above mentioned writ petitions shall stand decided by this common order being identical and arising out of the same application under Sections 18 and 21 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 pending between the same parties.

2. The Writ Petition No. 16965/2017 has been preferred by the petitioner - bank against impugned Order dated 04.09.2017 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Bikaner vide which the interim order granting status quo in favour of the respondent No. 1, the alleged tenant, was passed, whereas, the Writ Petition No. 654/2018 has been preferred against the Order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Bikaner dismissing the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C. filed by the petitioner - bank.

3. The facts in short are that the petitioner - I.C.I.C.I. Bank is a Banking Financial Institution registered under the Banking Regulation Act, 1954. The respondent Nos. 2 and 3 - borrowers approached the petitioner - bank for obtaining the financial assistance and availed the loan facility of Rs. 5,00,00,000/-, which was to be repaid by them in equated monthly installments along with applicable interest. For the purpose of repayment of t