SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 1181

SANDEEP MEHTA
SANJAY SINGH JETHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vandana Bhansali, M.S. Panwar, Simratha Ram, Advs.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

Through this miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the petitioner Sanjay Singh Jethi has approached this Court for quashing the FIR No.155/2017 lodged at the Police Station Mahila Thana, Jodhpur City (West) for the offence under Section 376 IPC.

2. It may be stated here, at the outset, that on the previous date of hearing, when the counsel engaged by the respondent No.2 complainant had appeared in the Court to argue the matter on her behalf, she was apprised of totally uncalled mails and letters sent by her to the petitioner's employer. She categorically stated that she would be forwarding an apology letter in this regard. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant and thus, this Court has proceeded to hear the matter ex-parte.

3. The FIR mentioned above came to be lodged by the respondent No.2 before the Commissioner of Police, Jodhpur Metropolitan with the following allegations:

"I am giving this application for your sincere concerned about the problem I am facing right now. I was studying in standard 11th in 2007 with my colleague Sanjay Singh Jethi. We were in same class and in same stream








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top