DEEPAK MAHESHWARI, J.

1. This criminal misc. petition has been preferred by accused-petitioner Amit Paharia with the prayer to quash the order dated 25.03.2017 passed by learned ACJM No. 1, Sikar, whereby the trial court took cognizance against him for the offence under Section 384 IPC on the basis of charge-sheet No. 54/2017 filed in FIR No. 72/2017, registered at PS Udhyog Nagar, Sikar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as also learned counsel for the complainant-respondent No. 2 and learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR No. 72/2017 came to be registered for the offence under Section 306 IPC. After investigation, a charge-sheet came to be filed against the accused-persons. Rakesh Kumar & Jitendra Singh were charged for the offence under Sections 306 & 382 IPC and Amit Paharia, who is petitioner herein & Abhishek Pilaniya were charge-sheeted for the offence under Section 384 IPC. Against six other persons investigation under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C., 1973 was kept pending. Vide order dated 25.03.2017 cognizance for the offence under Section 384 IPC was taken against petitioner-Amit Paharia.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case was registered on the FIR lodged by complainant-respondent No. 2 Manish Kumar Swami, on the allegation of his parents being harassed by some of the persons including the petitioner for realizing amount of loan advanced to him at a very heavy rate of interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a suicide note was left by deceased parents of complainant. The role alleged against petitioner Amit Paharia as mentioned in the said suicide note is as follows :-

uksV& vehr igkM+h;k dh nqdku tkjh;k cktkj esa igkM+h;k fM+Liksty ds uke ls gSA vehr igkM+h;k cgqr rst vkSj pkykd gSA ;s igys O;kt ij :i;s nsrk gSA fQj vius tky fdzdsV esa Qalk ysrk gSA bl vfer igkM+h;k us esjs yM+ds dks cgqr ywVk gSa cgqr fdzdsV f[kyk;k vkSj cgqr C;kt fy;k gSA

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an omnibus statement has been made in the said suicide note without mentioning any amount or rate of interest of the loan. Learned counsel submits that the complainant and petitioner Amit Paharia are childhood friends. The complainant has stated anything against the petitioner in his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., 1973 as to how much money and on which date was advanced by the petitioner to him and at what rate of interest he demanded the money back. He has referred to the relevant part of the statement, which reads as under :-

eSaus o esjs firkth }kjk ?kjsyw dk;Z o nqdku ds fy;s vHkh"ksd fiykuh;k uoyx<+ jksM+ lhdj] izse pkS/kjh dksfpx lsUVj lhdj] t;iky flag 'ks[kkor eydsM+k] jkds'k [khpM+ 'ks[kkoVh gksVy] 'ksj flag 'ks:] clUr fcgkj lhdj] ftrsUnz flag clUr fcgkj lhdj] gjh pkS/kjh tks izse pkS/kjh dk HkkbZ] vfer igkfM+;k nsohiqjk dksBh lhdj] lqjs'k dqekj] xqtZj gR;kt] vafdr iwuh;k ls :i;s m/kkj fy;s Fks bu yksxksa us esjs ls :i;ks dh ,ot es pSd o LVkEi ys fy;s gSA ftudks eSus o esjs firkth }kjk ewy/ku e; C;kt ds pqdrk dj fn;s FksA ysfdu mlds ckn Hkh esjs pSd o LVkEi okil ugh ykSVk jgs gSA mlds ckn Hkh jkds'k [khpM+ xkSdqyiqjk] vHkh"ksd fiykuh;k uoyx<+ jksM+ lhdj] ftrsUnz flag clUr fcgkj lhdj] lqjs'k dqekj xqtZj gkR;kt] 'ksj flag mQZ 'ks: calr fcgkj lhdj okys gekjs fdjk;s ds edku ij esjs firkth ls :i;s ekaxus ds fy;s vkrs FksA esjs firkth }kjk :i;s ugha nsus ij ;g lHkh esjs firkth o ekrkth dks ekulhd :i ls rax ijs'kku djrs FksA mudks /kedh nss FksA ;g yksx esjs lkFk Hkh ekjihV dj nsrs FksA buds M+j ls eS fdjk;s ds edku ls xk;c jgrk FkkA vfer igkfM+;k tks lVVk djrk Fkk eSa Hkh mlds lkFk lVVk djus yx x;kA eSa lVVs esa :i;s gkj tkus ij vfer igkfM+;k esjs :i;s ekaxus yx x;kA eSa lVVs esa :i;s gkj tkrk Fkk rc eSa lVVk ds fy;s :i;s t;iky flag eydsM+ka] gfj pkS/kjh o izse pkS/kjh tks dksfpax pykrs gS] vafdr iqfu;k ftuls :i;s m/kkj fy;s FksA vfer igkfM+;k] gfj pkS/kjh] izse pkS/kjh] t;iky flag 'ks[kkor] vafdr iqf