SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 2491

DINESH MEHTA
Devaram Pargi – Appellant
Versus
Amrit Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. C.P. Soni, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Dinesh Mehta, J.

On the last date i.e. 27.10.2017, this Court has posed a question regarding maintainability of the present writ petition, as according to prima facie opinion of this Court, an execution appeal would lie against the order rejecting an application under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. Mr. C.P. Soni, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner invited attention of this Court towards the definition of decree as given in definition of Clause 2(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, wherein "Section 47" of the Code of Civil Procedure has been deleted w.e.f. 01.02.1977.

3. In support of his submission, he also invited attention of this Court towards the Division Bench judgment dated 12.12.1977, reported in 1978 AIR (Raj) 127 titled as "Mohan Das v. Kamla Devi".

4. In view of submission so made, this Court is satisfied that as against the order passed, pursuant to an application under Section 47 read with under Order 21, Rule 46 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a writ petition under Article 227, is maintainable.

5. The petitioner has come against the order dated 06.05.2017 passed by learned Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, District Pali, (hereinafter ref









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top