SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 33

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Kalu – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S. Rathore, Adv., V.S. Rajpurohit, Adv., R.S. Chundawat, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Bhandari, J.

Petitioners have preferred this misc. petitions for quashing FIR No.627/2015 Hiran Magri Police Station, Udaipur dated 7/12/2015.

2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that respondent No.2 earlier lodged an FIR at Police Station Varda District Dungarpur on 01.11.2015.

3. Petitioners approached the High Court by filing misc. petition No. 3279/2015. The said misc. petition was disposed as report was submitted by learned public prosecutor that police has concluded that the matter is a monetary dispute and is of a civil nature.

4. Respondent also filed a separate FIR on 07.12.2015 at Hiran Magri, Udaipur on similar facts. Police in the present FIR submitted negative final report in February, 2016 after about 10 months, the matter was reopened and petitioners approached the High Court by filing the present misc. petition No.1332/2017 for quashing the proceedings in the FIR raising similar grounds, when police has already submitted negative final report.

5. It is contended that second FIR on similar facts cannot be lodged in a different police station. It is also contended that the continuation of proceedings in the present FIR is nothing but gross ab










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top