SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 46

P.K. LOHRA
RATHI STEEL & POWER LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
RAJ LIME PRODUCT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Subhash Chawala, Adv., Sunil Joshi, Adv., Jagat Tatia, Adv.

JUDGMENT

P.K. Lohra, J.

By the instant appeal, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'Act'), appellant has assailed order dated 23rd of August, 2018, passed Addl. District Judge No.2, Jodhpur Metropolitan, Jodhpur (for short 'learned Court below'). Learned Court below, by the order impugned, has rejected application of the appellant-defendant under Section 8(1) of the Act in a summary suit filed by respondent-plaintiff under Section 37 CPC for recovery of a sum of Rs.37,71,943.

2. Scorning the checkered history of the case, suffice it to state that respondent-plaintiff instituted a civil suit under Order 37 CPC against appellant before the learned Court below, inter-alia, on the ground that it is a proprietorship firm manufacturing quicklime and there were business transactions between plaintiff-firm and appellant-company since 2013. Further, elaborating the averments in this behalf, it is averred in the plaint that in the interregnum period from 25th of September 2013 to 12th of June 2014 petitioner company purchased quicklime worth Rs.58,37,204 including freight charges. The details of quicklime purchased by petitioner company from time to time i



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top