Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that the condition imposed by the trial court to accept bail bond qua bailable offence since defeat the very object, be modified and the petitioner be released upon furnishing personal bail bond.

2. Briefly stated, M/s. Shakthi Sona Solar Electric Limited (hereinafter called as the Company) had issued two cheques in favour of the respondent Vipul Nagpal. The petitioner Sona Goyal is stated to be the Director of the Company. The cheques issued by the petitioner company, on presentation bounced. The amount of two cheques issued by the Company comes to Rupees Twenty Two Crores and Eighty Lakhs. The complainant/ respondent on return of the cheques instituted Criminal Complaint No. 1525/2017 for prosecution of the petitioner and another co-accused of the petitioner for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. Upon appearance of the petitioner, the trial court on 13.11.2018 ordered that the petitioner should furnish personal bail bond of Rupees Four Crores alongwith duly verified surety of the similar amount. The relevant portion of the order dated 13.11.2018 passed by the trial court reads as under:-

^^mHk; i{kksa ds rdksZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA i=koyh o lacaf/kr fof/k dk v/;;u o voyksdu fd;k x;kA i=koyh ds voyksdu ij ;g ÁdV gksrk gS fd mDr Ádj.k esa vfHk;qDrx.k ij dqy 22 djksM+ 80 yk[k :i;s ds pSd vuknj.k dk vkjksi gSA ÁkFkhZ;k ds vf/koDrk us ÁkFkhZ;k dk dksbZ LFkkbZ irk ugha crk;k gS o ifjoknh }kjk dqN nLrkostkr ÁLrqr fd, x, gS ftlesa ;g n`f"Vxr gksrk gS fd ÁkFkhZ;k fons'kksa esa jgrh gS o mlds Hkkjr dk dksbZ LFkkbZ irk nf'kZr ugha gksrk gSA ÁkFkhZ;k dk dksbZ LFkkbZ irk fo}ku vf/koDrk ÁkFkhZ;k ,oa Lo;a ÁkFkhZ;k us Hkh ugha crk;k gS o lkFk gh mDr Ádj.k 22 djksM+ 80 yk[k :i;s dh jkf'k ekeyk gSA vr% Ádj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ÁkFkhZ;k dks vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd og 4 djksM+ :i;s dh jkf'k dk rLnhd'kqnk tekurh o blh jkf'k dk Lo;a dk eqpydk ÁLrqr dj U;k;ky; esa rLnhd djk, rks mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkos vU;Fkk vfHk;qDrk tsŒlhŒ esa jgsA U;k;ky; ds vkns'kkuqlkj ÁkFkhZ;k }kjk larks"kÁn tekur eqpydk o tekurh ÁLrqr ugha fd;k x;k ftlds dkj.k ÁkFkhZ;k dks fnukad 26-11-2018 rd tsŒlhŒ Hkstk tkrk gSA vfHk;qDrk dk tsŒlhŒ okjaV eqfrZc gksA mDr ÁkFkZuk i= QSlyk'kqekj dj ewy i=koyh ds lkFk layXu fd;k tkosA**

4. The petitioner failed to produce surety, who could furnish surety bond amounting to Rupees Four Crores, hence, on 13.11.2018 she was taken into custody. Since the petitioner could not meet stringent condition imposed by the trial court, while in custody she filed the present petition through counsel.

5. This Court on 5.12.2018 had passed the following order:-

"Counsel for the petitioner submitted that for offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act which is a bailable offence, onerous condition was imposed by the trial Court directing that petitioner should furnish a personal bail bond of Rs. 4 crores and also bond of the same amount by a surety. Counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is unable to furnish surety solvent to the above extent. It is submitted that condition imposed by the trial Court is onerous and for a bailable offence petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2018. Mr. C.P. Sharma has caused appearance on behalf of Mr. Mahendra Goyal for complainant-respondent. He prays for an adjournment to file 'Vakalatnama' of the respondent in the Registry.

Let 'Vakalatnama' be filed by the respondent in the Registry within one week from today.

List for arguments on 04.01.2019.

Meanwhile, petitioner shall be released on interim bail upon furnishing personal bail bond to the tune of Rs. 10 lacs with bonds by two solvent sureties of the same amount. The sureties to be produced by the petitioner shall be registered sureties and the bonds to be furnished by them shall be verified by a Revenue Officer not below the rank of Tehsildar "

6. Mr. S.S. Hora, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted