ARUN BHANSALI
Shyam Singh Ranawat – Appellant
Versus
Jaipur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited – Respondent
Arun Bhansali, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to decide petitioner's objection regarding answer of question Nos. 27, 64, 70 & 87 and further direction to issue revised answer key, issue fresh result and cut of marks of the written examination for recruitment on the post of Technical Helper (Electrician) pursuant to the advertisement (Annexure-1).
2. It is, inter alia, indicated in the writ petition that pursuant to the advertisement No. 1/2018-19 for recruitment on the post of Technical Helper issued by respondent Nigam the petitioner being eligible submitted online application form with required documents. Admit cards were issued and the petitioner participated in the written examination.
3. The respondents published first answer key and objections were invited. The petitioner raised objections regarding question Nos. 27, 46, 64, 70, 87 & 91, from which, objections to two questions No. 46 and 91 were considered but objection of the remaining questions have not been considered. The revised answer key was published on 14.09.2018, regarding which, it is submitted that the objections raised have not been considered
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.