SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 154

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SANDEEP MEHTA, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, JJ.
Bhatta Ram - Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 496 of 2017
Decided On : 05-04-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Tarun Dhaka, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondents: N.S. Bhati, Public Prosecutor.

Headnote:

Criminal procedure code1973 - Section 374(2) - Death - Evidence Act - Section 27 – Witnesses - Written Report – Evidence - Exhibited documents in support of its case - Upon being questioned and when confronted with the prosecution allegations accused denied same and claimed have been falsely implicated - However no evidence was led in defense - Upon hearing the arguments advanced by Public Prosecutor and defense counsel and after appreciating evidence available on record Trial Judge proceeded to convict and sentence appellant as above whereas co-accused Motile was acquitted by giving him benefit doubt - Hence this appeal –Held, In view of discussion made herein above Court have no hesitation holding that prosecution failed lead convincing and clinching evidence establish by proof beyond reasonable doubt that was unexceptionally accused appellant who murdered deceased impugned judgment is perverse and based on an absolutely inappropriate appreciation of evidence available on record - Hence impugned judgment deserves to be struck down – Appeal allowed

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. The accused Bhatta Ram stands convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 22.02.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bali, District Pali, (Camp Desuri) in Sessions Case No. 40/2009:

Offence

Sentence

Fine

Fine Default sentence

Under Section 302 IPC

Life Imprisonment

Rs. 10,000/-

Six Months' Additional Simple Imprisonment

2. Being aggrieved of his conviction and sentence, the accused appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeal are noted herein below:

Kesaram (PW-3) submitted a written report (Ex. P/15) to the SHO Police Station Desuri, District Pali at the Suresh Piau (place of the occurrence) on 03.05.2009 at 04.30 p.m. alleging inter alia that his brother Bheraram son of Balaji, resident of Chhoda had gone towards Kelwa with his wife and children for doing labour jobs. The complainant claims to have received an information on 03.05.2009 at about 3-4 o' clock that a dead body was lying behind the Suresh Piau. He went there to have a look at the dead body and on checking, he realized that the dead body was that of his brother. He suspected that someone had made his brother to consume liquor on the previous night and thereafter, stabbed him on the abdomen by a broken liquor bottle as a result whereof, his brother expired. The liquor and beer bottles were lying at the spot. An empty insecticide bottle and its cap were lying in the nearby field. The informant requested the SHO to take requisite action. On the basis of this information, a formal FIR No. 48/2009 (Ex. P/16) was registered at the Police Station Desuri for the offence under Section 302 IPC and investigation was undertaken by the SHO Desuri Shri Narendra Singh (PW-21) who conducted the requisite spot verification proceedings. The Panchnama of the dead body and the spot memo were prepared. The hair stuck in the hands of the deceased Bheraram were seized. The blood stained broken bottle of Bagpiper brand liquor was seized from the place of the occurrence. Some pieces of the bottle which were also stained with the blood, were also collected. The bottle of insecticide lying in the nearby field was also seized. Blood stained soil as well as control soil samples were also taken from the place of the occurrence. All these articles were allegedly sealed. The mobile phone allegedly owned by Bheraram and a pair of leather jutis were also seized from the place of the occurrence. The blood stained clothes of Bheraram were presented to him by Kesaram which were also seized and sealed. The dead body of Bheraram was subjected to the postmortem through a Medical Board constituted at the Government Hospital, Desuri. The I.O. proceeded to record the statements of Lachcharam, Kesara, Smt. Teepu, Abu Singh, Roop Singh, Suganraj, Jaisingh, Mansingh, Surendra Singh. The accused Bhattaram who was suspected to be the murder of the case, was arrested vide arrest memo (Ex. P/36) dated 04.05.2009. During his personal search, a mobile phone was seized from the accused. The accused gave an information to the I.O. under Section 27 of the Evidence Act (Ex. P/40) and thereafter, his clothes were seized. The medical examination of the accused was conducted at the Government Hospital, Desuri on which, multiple abrasions with clotted blood present thereupon, were noticed on his left hand. The accused allegedly pointed out the place of occurrence to the I.O. in furtherance of his information under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The motorcycle owned by the accused, which was available with him at the time of the incident, was also seized. The recovered blood stained articles and the control articles were sent to the FSL for serological and chemical examination. One more accused Motilal son of Devaram was suspected

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top