SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 217

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Madan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Vineet Jain, R.K. Charan, Kalu Ram Bhati.
For the Respondent: C.S. Ojha.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. The accused appellants Madan Lal, Shiv Lal, Samundar Lai and Mahendra have been convicted and sentenced as below vide the judgment dated 31.3.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Bhilwara in Sessions Case No. 20/2012:

For offence under Section 302 read with 34 I.P.C.

Imprisonment for Life with a fine of Rs. 5000/- each

In default of payment of fine, to further undergo Six months Rigorous Imprisonment

For offence under Section 460 I.P.C.

10 Years’ Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5000/- each

In default of payment of fine, to further undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment

Substantive sentence have been ordered to run concurrently.

2. They have preferred these three separate appeals under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. for assailing their conviction.

3. Since all the three appeals are directed against a common judgment, the same are being heard and decided together.

4. Facts in brief are that Prakash Chandra Dangi P.W.1 lodged a report at the Police Station Raipur, District Bhilwara alleging int
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top