SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 232

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
Times S.T.C. College, Amarpura Thedi, Hanumanarh - Appellants
Vs.
National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi and Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ No. 2270 of 2019
Decided On : 27-03-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : C.S. Kotwani
For the Respondents: Namrata Gupta and Manish Vyas, AAG

The NCTE should consider the current position of the state, including any review of a ban on opening new institutions and the grant of NOCs, while deciding applications for recognition of teacher education programs.

Headnote:

EDUCATION - TEACHER EDUCATION - RECOGNITION OF INSTITUTIONS - NCTE REGULATIONS - STATE BAN ON OPENING NEW INSTITUTIONS - REVIEW OF BAN - CONSIDERATION OF CURRENT POSITION - NCTE TO DECIDE APPLICATION AFRESH - STAND OF STATE TO BE CONSIDERED.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner, an educational institution, applied for recognition to run a teacher education course under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993. The application was rejected based on a state ban on opening new institutions. The ban was later reviewed, and the state granted NOCs to certain districts to run such courses. The petitioner challenged the rejection of its application.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the NCTE should have considered the current position of the state, including the review of the ban and the grant of NOCs, while deciding the petitioner's application. The court quashed the rejection order and directed the NCTE to decide the application afresh, taking into account the state's stand and the demand-supply ratio of teacher education programs.

Issues: Whether the NCTE should have considered the current position of the state, including the review of the ban and the grant of NOCs, while deciding the petitioner's application.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the NCTE should have considered the current position of the state, including the review of the ban and the grant of NOCs, while deciding the petitioner's application. The court relied on the judgment of a coordinate bench of the same court, which had directed the NCTE to consider the case of an institution in light of the state's decision to lift the ban on opening new institutions.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, quashed the rejection order, and directed the NCTE to decide the application afresh, taking into account the state's stand and the demand-supply ratio of teacher education programs.

ORDER :

DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.

2.1. The petitioner institution is an educational institution which is run by a registered society. National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi is created under the provisions of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (for short, ‘the Act of 1993’). The regulations, norms and procedure are fixed under the provisions of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 (for short, the Regulations of 2014’), which have been amended from time to time. These Regulations are applicable to the matters relating to the Teacher Training Programmes.

2.2. The respondent no. 2 in the year 2012 invited applications from the institutions situated the States of North India (including State of Rajasthan) desiring to run the teacher education courses. As the petitioner was fulfilling the mandatory requirements as per the Act of 1993 and was fully eligible to run the Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed./B.S.T.C.) course applied through online mode for the academic session 2013-14 under the provisions of Section 14(1) of the Act of 1993.

2.3. The respondent no. 2 in its 214 meeting considered the matter of the petitioner along with other matters and decided that the recommendations of State of Rajasthan to now allow setting up of D.El.Ed. Institutions in the State of Rajasthan be accepted and the application so received be returned to the respective institutions. As such, the respondent vide letter dated 18.6.2013 returned the application of the petitioner purely on the basis of the aforesaid recommendations.

2.4. The decision taken by the State of Rajasthan in the year 2009 that no BSTC/D.El.Ed./B.Ed. course would be permitted was reviewed by the State of Rajasthan on 12.8.2016 and certain districts were granted NOC to run such course.

2.5. The petitioner thereafter filed a writ petition no. 23106/2018 at Jaipur Bench of this Court in which the matter was relegated to the appellate authority. The appellate authority by its order dated 31.12.2018 proceeded to confirm the refusal order dated 18.6.2013 without considering the fulfillment of the requisite qualification of the petitioner.

3.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order passed by the appellate authority is solely on the basis of judgment rendered by the Delhi High Court in the case of Saraswati Deep College of Education vs. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr. (LPA 619/2018) decided on 31.10.2018 whereby the Delhi High Court confirmed the decision of NCTE of returning the application in furtherance of State Ban. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the appellate authority was seized of the fact that the State of Rajasthan is no more having ban on opening new institutions in view of the order dated 12.8.2016, the petitioner should have been considered independent of the judgment of Delhi High Court in Saraswati Deep’s case (supra) which was relating to State of Haryana, the relevant portion whereof reads as follows:-

“7. From the above, it is clear that many seats in Teacher Education Institutes remained unfilled. In such a scenario, no further recognition can be granted to the Institutes. There is no justification to allow the mushrooming of Institutes conducting Teacher Education courses. The NCTE is within its competence to consider the decision of the State of Haryana not to allow setting up of new B.Ed Institutions in the State. In fact, the Regional Committee of the NCTE declined to grant recognition vide order dated 3rd July, 2013. The last para of which reads as under:

“In view of the above judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the decision taken by the NCTE Committee, the NRC decided that the recommendations of the State of Govt. of Haryana, i.e., not to allow setting up of new B.Ed. institutions in the State be accepted and the applications

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top