Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has shown the order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Narayan Lal vs. State & Ors. (S.B. Civil Parole Writ Petition No. 9577/2014) decided on 04.02.2015. The said order dated 04.02.2015 reads as follows:-

"The convict-prisoner has preferred this letter petition for granting him permanent parole, which was treated as petition for writ and notices were issued to the respondents.

According to the reply submitted on behalf of the respondents, the convict-prisoner was convicted vide judgment dated 08.07.2009 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sojat for the offences under Sections 376, 377 and 342 IPC and was sentenced to undergo 10 years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,500/-, in default whereof to further undergo one year and one month's simple imprisonment. The convict-prisoner preferred appeal before this court, which is still pending. It was also submitted in the reply that till 06.01.2015, the convict-prisoner has served the sentence for 7 years 4 months and 25 days. Previously, he was given the first parole for 20 days, second parole for 30 days and third parole for 40 d