IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
DINESH MEHTA, J.
Chintu @ Chandra Shekhar - Appellant
Versus
State, through PP - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6657 of 2019
Decided On : 07-06-2019
Arms Act - Bail Application - The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. as the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act was prima facie bailable and there was no allegation of use of arms.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act. The court below had rejected the bail application, citing three cases under Section 323 IPC as a reason for rejection.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the offence was prima facie bailable and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, the bail application deserved to be accepted.
Issues: The issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail for the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act, despite the rejection of the bail application by the court below.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the prima facie bailable nature of the offence and the absence of allegations of use of arms in granting the bail application.
Final Decision: The bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.
1. This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 251/2019, Police Station Kotwali, Nimbaheda, District Chittorgarh, for the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.
3. Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offence alleged against the petitioner is Section 3/25 of Arms Act, 1959, which is bailable offence as held by this Court in the case of Ramvilas @ Billu v. State of Rajasthan, decided on 02.09.2009. However, as there is a contrary view also taken by this Court, the police treats the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act to be non-bailable.
4. Learned counsel further submits that the court below has rejected the petitioners bail application vide impugned order, notwithstanding the fact that the co-accused has been enlarged on bail by the same court on 30.05.2019.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed this bail application.
6. Upon perusal of the impugned order, this Court finds that while rejecting the petitioners bail, the court below has observed that there are three cases under Section 323 IPC, which in opinion of this Court cannot be a bar for grant of bail, particularly when there was no allegation of use of arms.
7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that the offence is prima facie bailable and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
8. Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that petitioner Chintu @ Chandra Shekhar S/o Shri Shyam Lal arrested in FIR No. 251/2019, Police Station Nimbaheda, District Chittorgarh shall be released on bail; provided he executes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.