SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 377

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Sandeep Mehta, Vinit Kumar Mathur, JJ.
SADDAM HUSSAIN KHAN AND ANOTHER - Appellant
Vs.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH PP - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 125 of 2018
Decided On : 31-05-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. H.S.S. Kharlia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harvir Sidhu, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Joshi, Public Prosecutor

Headnote:

Evidence Act – Section 27 – IPC – Sections 302, 302/34, 201 404/34, and 374(2) – Appellants convicted and sentenced Life Imprisonment 6 Months R.I.7 Years R.I, 3 Months R.I., complainant alleged Saddam, Pintu and their companions had murdered his brother Aziz owing to monetary dispute, on basis of this report, FIR was registered at Police Station Jamsar, District Bikaner for offence of murder and investigation commenced, investigation undertaken by Vikram Singh PW-15, SHO, Police Station Jamsar, accused Saddam arrested. vide arrest memo Ex.P/11 accused Pintu arrested ovide arrest memo Ex.P/12I.O. claims to recorded the information of accused –Held, Trial court committed fundamental errors while appreciating evidence available on record; holding circumstances to be proved and recording conviction of accused appellants by impugned judgment which stand to scrutiny even for moment, keeping in view provisions of Section 437-A Cr.P.C., each of accused appellants is directed to furnish personal bond in sum of Rs. 15,000/- and surety bond in like amount before learned trial court, which shall be effective for period of six months to effect that in event of filing of Special Leave Petition against present judgment on receipt of notice thereof, appellants shall appear before Supreme Court – Appeal allowed. (Para 31, 32, 33)

Facts of the case: Appellants convicted and sentenced Life Imprisonment 6 Months R.I.7 Years R.I, 3 Months R.I., complainant alleged Saddam, Pintu and their companions had murdered his brother Aziz owing to monetary dispute, on basis of this report, FIR was registered at Police Station Jamsar, District Bikaner for offence of murder and investigation commenced, investigation undertaken by Vikram Singh PW-15, SHO, Police Station Jamsar, accused Saddam arrested. vide arrest memo Ex.P/11 accused Pintu arrested ovide arrest memo Ex.P/12I.O. claims to recorded the information of accused.

Findings of the court: Trial court committed fundamental errors while appreciating evidence available on record; holding circumstances to be proved and recording conviction of accused appellants by impugned judgment which stand to scrutiny even for moment, keeping in view provisions of Section 437-A Cr.P.C., each of accused appellants is directed to furnish personal bond in sum of Rs. 15,000/- and surety bond in like amount before learned trial court, which shall be effective for period of six months to effect that in event of filing of Special Leave Petition against present judgment on receipt of notice thereof, appellants shall appear before Supreme Court.

Result: Appeal allowed

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

The appellants herein have been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 11.06.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No. 3, Bikaner in Sessions Case No. 130/2012 (N.C.V. No. 588/2012):

Offences

Sentences

Fine

Fine Default sentences

Section 302/34 IPC

Life Imprisonment

Rs. 10,000/-

6 Months R.I.

Section 201/34 IPC

7 Years R.I.

Rs. 2,000/-

3 Months R.I.

All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved of their conviction and sentences, the appellants have preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Facts in brief are that Shri Idrish Shah son of Moinudeen (PW-1) lodged a written report (Ex.P/1) to the SHO, Police Station Jamsar, District Bikaner on 03.03.2012 at 07.00 am. alleging inter alia that on the previous day i.e. on 02.03.2012 in the evening, he alongwith his brother Aziz Shah went to the Jugnu Gypsum Factory for claiming the due wages of their labour jobs from the factory owner Saddam Hussain. There, they came across Saddam Hussain, Pintu and 3-4 other unknown persons. He asked for his remaining wages from Saddam Hussain. Saddam and his associates became annoyed and hurled an insinuation towards the complainant that he had demanded money on a number of occasions whereas, they were in a habit of usurping the wages of labourers. Saddam threatened that if any demand was made, the complainant would be killed. A hue and cry was raised on which, the villagers Sawai Shah and Akbar Shah intervened and advised Saddam not to withhold the remuneration of the labourers. On this, Saddam relented and stated that one of the brothers should stay back and that in the meanwhile, he would get the due money from Bikaner and settle the accounts. Thereupon, the complainant left his brother Aziz in the factory of Saddam and himself went away to his village. As Aziz Shah did not return home till 9 o clock in the night, the complainant and his maternal uncle Vazir Shah went to the Jugnu Gypsum Factory but did not find anyone there. The complainant apprised his family members of this development that Aziz and the factory owners were missing and that the motorcycle of Aziz was also nowhere to be seen. The complainant, his family members and the villagers Vazir Shah, Hanif Shah, Shahabuddin, father Moinuddin and other 7-8 persons, launched a search for Aziz. While they were conducting the search, his relative Bhanwar Shah received a call on his mobile from Saddam who insinuated that the final account of Aziz had been settled and that he would not return now and that the dues of the complainant too would be settled in the same manner. The complainant alleged that Saddam, Pintu and their companions had murdered his brother Aziz owing to the monetary dispute. On the basis of this report, FIR No. 30/2012 (Ex.P/2) was registered at the Police Station Jamsar, District Bikaner for the offence under Section 302/34 of the IPC and investigation was commenced. The investigation was undertaken by Vikram Singh (PW-15), the SHO, Police Station Jamsar. The accused Saddam was arrested on 03.03.2012 at 10.25 am. vide arrest memo (Ex.P/11). The accused Pintu was arrested on 03.03.2012 at 10.30 am. vide arrest memo (Ex.P/12). The I.O. claims to have recorded the informations of the accused under Section 27 of the Evidence Act in the following order:

Ex.P/15- Information recorded at the instance of the accused Saddam on 03.03.2012 at 10.45 pm. regarding concealment of deadbody of Aziz Shah,

Ex.P/16- Information recorded at the instance of the accused Pintu on 03.03.2012 at 11.00 am. regarding concealment of deadbody of Aziz,

Ex.P/18- Information recorded at the instance of the accused Pintu on 04.03.2012 at 03.45 pm. regarding concealment of motorcycle,

Ex.P/19- Information rec




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top