SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 404

ARUN BHANSALI
JYOTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vineet R. Dave, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners aggrieved against the result of lottery (Annex.6) conducted by the respondents for selection on the post of Safai Karamchari and a direction to the respondents to accommodate the petitioners on the post of Safai Karamchari pursuant to the advertisement dated 13/4/2018.

2. Essentially the petitioners are seeking direction that the respondents should have drawn lots (conducted lottery) of general category candidates independent of candidates of reserved category.

3. The issue raised in the present writ petition has already been decided by this Court in Sumitra Devi & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13481/2018 and other connected matters, decided on 26.9.2018, wherein, this Court has negated the contentions raised by the petitioners therein.

4. In the case of Sumitra Devi (supra) this Court laid down as under:-

"The petitioners, as noticed hereinbefore, belong to Scheduled Caste, chose to file applications as general category candidates and now seeking to question the fact that the reserved category candidates have been granted two opportunities, one while drawing the lottery pertaining to re








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top