SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 482

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Sewa Nand S/o Shri Brahamdutta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.R. Godara.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Joshi.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. The appellant herein has been convicted and sentenced as below vide the judgment dated 26.04.2016 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge Anoopgarh in Sessions Case No. 08/2009:-

Under Section 302

Life Imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/-. In default of payment of fine to further undergo 6 months’ simple imprisonment.

Under Section 364

Ten years’ RI and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-. In default of payment of fine to further undergo one month’s simple imprisonment.

Under Section 201

One year’s RI and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-. In default of payment of fine to further undergo 15 days’ simple imprisonment.

All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved of his conviction and sentences, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C.

3. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant appeal are noted herein-below:-

The SHO PS Anoopgarh received a telephonic information on 04.01.2009 that a dead body of a woman was








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top