SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Palak Jain – Appellant
Versus
Naveen Rawat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amit Jindal.
For the Respondent: Ms. Vandana Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, J.

1. The appeal being D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5935/2018 on behalf of the appellant-wife Smt. Palak Jain has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984, praying for quashment and setting aside the order dated 28.11.2018 passed by the Judge, Family Court No. 1, Jaipur, whereby the application dated 14.11.2018 filed by both the parties for cooling off the period of six months, was dismissed.

2. It is contended that the appellant-wife filed an application under section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act on 12.11.2018 seeking divorce from the respondent-husband with mutual consent, which was posted to be listed before the court on 13.05.2019, i.e. after six months. Both the parties moved an application on 14.11.2018 for waiver of six months cooling period on the ground that there is no possibility for the parties to live together and they have been living separately from 18.10.2014 and 12 cases are pending between them in different courts. Ignoring those facts, the Family Court rejected the application on the ground that the parties have moved the application just after two days of its filing.

3. Learned counsel for both the parties submitte




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top