SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DINESH MEHTA
Priti – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Kumar Gandhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pritam Joshi.
For the Respondent: Mr. Kailash Khatri.

JUDGMENT :

DINESH MEHTA, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking transfer of Civil Misc. Case No. 120/2017, titled as Naresh vs. Smt. Priti, from learned Additional District and Session Judge, Suratgarh, District- Sriganganagar to Family Court, Bikaner.

2. Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner narrating the facts informs that the petitioner got married with the respondent as per Hindu rituals on 23.11.2010. However, thereafter their matrimony got strained and she has come to Bikaner to live with her parents.

3. He submitted that the respondent - husband has filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking dissolution of the marriage, which is pending before learned

Additional District and Session Judge, Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

4. Pointing out the predicament of the petitioner, learned counsel contended that the Suratgarh is about 180 Kms. from Bikaner and the petitioner who has a minor daughter of 3 years, finds it difficult and daunting to come all the way to Suratgarh. He further informs that two cases, one under Section 498 of IPC and another under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed b













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top