SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DINESH MEHTA
Uma Devi – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ramesh Purohit.

ORDER :

1. Despite service of notice, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent- husband.

2. The present transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of the Divorce Petition No. 52/2014 titled as Vinod Vaishnav vs. Smt. Uma, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, filed by the respondent-husband, which is pending before Additional District Judge, Bhinmal to the competent Court at Sumerpur.

3. Mr. Ramesh Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner-wife, narrating the facts relevant for the purpose of deciding the present transfer application, submitted that the petitioner got married with the respondent on 27.02.2009, after observing the customs and rituals prevailing in Hindus. However, her matrimonial relationship with the respondent-husband could not go smoothly, in wake of ill-treatment meted out to her by the respondent-husband, for which, she has come to Sumerpur to live with her parents.

4. The petitioner has filed a case under Section 12 read with Sections 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the Protection from Domestic Violence Act against the respondent-husband in the Court of competent jurisdiction, which is pending adju













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top