SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 668

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, ALOK SHARMA
Ess Kay Fincorp Limited – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Choudhary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Himanshu Jain and Alok Garg
For the Respondent: Vikas Jain

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The Commercial Court constituted under the Commercial Courts Act would be the only competent court to execute an arbitral award on a "commercial dispute" (not the Principal Civil Court) (!) (!) . - Proviso to Section 15(2) of the Commercial Courts Act serves a limited purpose to ensure finality of cases where judgments have been reserved before constitution, and does not bar execution applications for awards from being entertained by the Commercial Court (!) (!) (!) (!) . - A conjoint reading of Section 10(3) and 15(2) indicates that execution of an award under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act, when the subject matter is a commercial dispute, should be filed with the Commercial Court rather than the Principal Civil Court (!) (!) (!) .

What is the competent court to execute an arbitral award on a commercial dispute under Arbitration Act and Commercial Courts Act?

What is the effect of the proviso to Section 15(2) of the Commercial Courts Act on transfer of execution applications for arbitral awards?

What is the interpretation of Section 10(3) and 15(2) of the Commercial Courts Act in relation to execution of arbitral awards?


JUDGMENT :

Mohammad Rafiq, J.

1. These three matters, two appeals and a writ petition, raise a common question of law as to which of the two Courts;-Principal Civil Court, having the original jurisdiction in a district i.e. the Court of District and Sessions Judge, as defined under Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Arbitration Act') or the Commercial Court constituted under Section 3(1) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (for short 'the Commercial Courts Act') and as defined in Section 2(b) of that Act, would be competent to execute an arbitral award, on a "commercial dispute" passed under the Arbitration Act?

2. Before adverting to the rival submissions, we deem it appropriate to briefly notice the facts of these matters.

3. Appeal No. 12/2019 has been filed by the appellant Ess Kay Fincorp Limited assailing order dated 20.10.2018 passed by the Commercial Court, Ajmer (for short 'the Commercial Court'), dismissing Execution Application No. 06/2018 seeking execution of the award dated 12.03.2018 whereby claim of the appellant was allowed and the respondents were directed to

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top