IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Arun Bhansali, J.
Asif Ali Khan - Appellants
Vs.
State of Rajasthan and Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9455 of 2019
Decided On : 04-09-2019
CHANGE OF CATEGORY - RECRUITMENT PROCESS - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT RULES, 1954 - RULE 14 - COURT DIRECTED THE BOARD TO CHANGE THE CATEGORY OF THE PETITIONER FROM GENERAL TO OBC (NON-CREAMY LAYER) AND PERMIT HIM TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FURTHER RECRUITMENT PROCESS IN THE SAID CATEGORY.
Fact of the Case:
THE PETITIONER, BELONGING TO THE OBC (NON-CREAMY LAYER) CATEGORY, MISTAKENLY INDICATED HIS CATEGORY AS GENERAL WHILE FILLING OUT AN ONLINE APPLICATION FORM FOR A CLERK GR. II/JUNIOR ASSISTANT POSITION. HE REQUESTED A CHANGE IN HIS CATEGORY AFTER PASSING THE PRELIMINARY WRITTEN EXAM.
Finding of the Court:
THE COURT OBSERVED THAT RECTIFYING A BONA FIDE MISTAKE THAT DOES NOT AFFECT A THIRD PARTY'S RIGHTS SHOULD BE PERMITTED. IT ALSO NOTED THAT THE PETITIONER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PRODUCE THE REQUISITE OBC (NON-CREAMY LAYER) CERTIFICATE DURING DOCUMENT VERIFICATION.
Issues: WHETHER THE PETITIONER COULD CHANGE HIS CATEGORY FROM GENERAL TO OBC (NON-CREAMY LAYER) AFTER THE PRELIMINARY WRITTEN EXAM.
Ratio Decidendi: THE COURT RELIED ON THE DIVISION BENCH JUDGMENT IN KAVITA CHOUDHARY V. THE REGISTRAR (EXAMINATION), RHC JODHPUR & ANR., WHEREIN IT WAS HELD THAT A BONA FIDE MISTAKE THAT DOES NOT AFFECT A THIRD PARTY'S RIGHTS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BE CURED.
Final Decision: THE COURT ALLOWED THE PETITION AND DIRECTED THE BOARD TO CHANGE THE PETITIONER'S CATEGORY FROM GENERAL TO OBC (NON-CREAMY LAYER), ALLOWING HIM TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FURTHER RECRUITMENT PROCESS.
ORDER :
Arun Bhansali, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to change the category of the petitioner from General to OBC (Non-Creamy layer) for further recruitment process for the post of Clerk Gr. II/Junior Assistant.
2. It is inter alia indicated in the writ petition that the petitioner belongs to OBC (Non-Creamy layer) category. Pursuant to the advertisement dated 16.4.2018 (Annex. 2), the petitioner filled online application on 1.6.2018, wherein, on account of alleged mistake committed by the E-Mitra Franchisee instead of indicating his category as OBC (Non-Creamy layer), the same was indicated as General. The petitioner participated in the written examination and by the result dated 7.3.2019 (Annex. 5), the roll number of the petitioner has been indicated in the list of successful candidates, who would now participate in the type test. At this stage, the petitioner became aware of the fact that instead of OBC (Non-Creamy layer), his category has wrongly been indicated as General. Based on the said submissions, it is prayed in the writ petition that the petitioner may be permitted to change his category.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner made submissions that the category indicated at the time of filling up the online application form by mistake, the petitioner has not taken any advantage of the said mistake and that once the mistake has come to light, the petitioner may be permitted to change the category as so far the type test is to be held and the final result has so far not been declared so as to harm any other candidate.
4. Reliance has been placed on Division Bench judgment in Kavita Choudhary v. The Registrar (Examination), RHC Jodhpur & Anr.: D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1700/2017, decided on 1.11.2017.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent - Board made submissions that the stipulations made in the advertisement were specific indicating that the petitioner must ensure the category in which, he was filling up the form and after once choosing the category, the candidate would not be permitted to change the category. Further provision was made that any mistake committed could be rectified within a period of 7 days from the last date of application, however, the petitioner did not correct the alleged mistake.
6. Submissions have been made that at the time of filling up the online application form, the petitioner was not in possession of a certificate of OBC (Non-Creamy layer) and, therefore, he has filled up the form as General candidate, which he now cannot be permitted to alter and, therefore, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed.
7. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and have perused the material available on record.
8. It is not in dispute that the petitioner filled up the application form as a General candidate and has succeeded in the preliminary written examination as a General candidate, however, now on realization that the category indicated in the application was incorrect, is seeking correction in the application form.
9. So far as the plea raised by counsel for the respondent regarding petitioner not being in possession of requisite certificate of OBC (Non-Creamy layer) is concerned, the stipulation made in the advertisement is clear, wherein, the candidate is required to produce the requisite certificate after passing the main examination at the time of document verification.
10. In view thereof, as to whether the petitioner was in possession of the requisite certificate at the time of filling up the online application form is apparently of no consequence.
11. The Division Bench in the case of Kavita Choudhary (supra) in an identical fact situation, wherein, the candidate instead of indicating her status as OBC (Non-Creamy layer) indicated her status as OBC (Creamy layer) inter alia observed and directed as under:-
8. Mistakes ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.